FOLLOWUS
A pragmatic observational feasibility study on integrated treatment for musculoskeletal disorders: Design and protocol
- Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Vol. 22, Issue 2, Pages: 88-95(2016)
- Affiliations：
1. Faculty of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University,London,UK
2. Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine, University College London Hospital National Health Service Trust,London,UK
3. Personal Social Services Research Unit, Health and Social Care, the London School of Economics and Political Science,London,UK
- Author bio：
- Funds：
DOI：10.1007/s11655-013-1557-9
CLC：Published：2016，
Published Online：13 December 2013，
Scan for full text
Hu, X., Hughes, J., Fisher, P. et al. A pragmatic observational feasibility study on integrated treatment for musculoskeletal disorders: Design and protocol., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 22, 88–95 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1557-9
Xiaoyang Hu, John Hughes, Peter Fisher, et al. A pragmatic observational feasibility study on integrated treatment for musculoskeletal disorders: Design and protocol. [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 22(2):88-95(2016)
Hu, X., Hughes, J., Fisher, P. et al. A pragmatic observational feasibility study on integrated treatment for musculoskeletal disorders: Design and protocol., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 22, 88–95 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1557-9 DOI：
Xiaoyang Hu, John Hughes, Peter Fisher, et al. A pragmatic observational feasibility study on integrated treatment for musculoskeletal disorders: Design and protocol. [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 22(2):88-95(2016) DOI： 10.1007/s11655-013-1557-9.
摘要
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) comprise a wide range of conditions
associated with an enormous pain and impaired mobility
and are affecting people’s lives and work. Management of musculoskeletal disorders typically involves a multidisciplinary team approach. Positive findings have been found in previous studies evaluating the effectiveness of complementary therapies
though little attention has been paid to evaluating of the effectiveness of integrated packages of care combining conventional and complementary approaches for musculoskeletal conditions in a National Health Service (NHS) setting. To determine the feasibility of all aspects of a pragmatic observational study designed: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of integrated treatments for MSDs in an integrated NHS hospital in the UK; (2) to determine the acceptability of the study design and research process to patients; (3) to explore patients’ expectation and experience of receiving integrated treatments. This is an observational feasibility study
with 1-year recruitment and 1-year follow-up
conducted in Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine
University College London Hospital Trust
UK. All eligible patients with MSDs newly referred to the hospital were included in the study. Interventions are integrated packages of care (conventional and complementary) as currently provided in the hospital. SF-36™ Health Survey
short form Brief Pain Inventory
Visual Analogue Scale
and modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at 4/5 time points. Semi-structured interview/focus group will be carried out before treatment
and 1 year after commence of treatment. We intend to conduct a pragmatic observational study of integrated medical treatment of MSDs at a public sector hospital. It will inform the design of a future trial including recruitment
retention
suitability of the outcome measures and patients experiences.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) comprise a wide range of conditions
associated with an enormous pain and impaired mobility
and are affecting people’s lives and work. Management of musculoskeletal disorders typically involves a multidisciplinary team approach. Positive findings have been found in previous studies evaluating the effectiveness of complementary therapies
though little attention has been paid to evaluating of the effectiveness of integrated packages of care combining conventional and complementary approaches for musculoskeletal conditions in a National Health Service (NHS) setting. To determine the feasibility of all aspects of a pragmatic observational study designed: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of integrated treatments for MSDs in an integrated NHS hospital in the UK; (2) to determine the acceptability of the study design and research process to patients; (3) to explore patients’ expectation and experience of receiving integrated treatments. This is an observational feasibility study
with 1-year recruitment and 1-year follow-up
conducted in Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine
University College London Hospital Trust
UK. All eligible patients with MSDs newly referred to the hospital were included in the study. Interventions are integrated packages of care (conventional and complementary) as currently provided in the hospital. SF-36™ Health Survey
short form Brief Pain Inventory
Visual Analogue Scale
and modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at 4/5 time points. Semi-structured interview/focus group will be carried out before treatment
and 1 year after commence of treatment. We intend to conduct a pragmatic observational study of integrated medical treatment of MSDs at a public sector hospital. It will inform the design of a future trial including recruitment
retention
suitability of the outcome measures and patients experiences.
关键词
Integrated Medicinemusculoskeletal disordersfeasibility studymixed method
Keywords
Integrated Medicinemusculoskeletal disordersfeasibility studymixed method
references
McIntosh G, Hall H. Low back pain (acute). Clin Evid 2011;2011.
Falco FJE, Erhart S, Wargo BW, Bryce DA, Atluri S, Datta S, et al. Systematic review of diagnostic utility and therapeutic eeffectiveness of cervical facet joint interventions. Pain Physi 2009;12:323–344.
Cimmino MA, Ferrone C, Cutolo M. Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2011;25:173–183.
Bhattacharya A, Leigh JP. Musculoskeletal disorder costs and medical claim filing in the US retail trade sector. Industrial Health 2011;49:517–522.
Fit for work? Musculoskeletal disorders and labour market participation. Available at: http://www.theworkfoundation.com/assets/docs/publications/44_fit_for_work_small.pdf.
Thomas KJ, Coleman P, Nicholl JP. Trends in access to complementary or alternative medicines via primary care in England: 1995-2001. results from a follow-up national survey. Family Pract 2003;20:575–577.
Kanodia AK, Legedza ATR, Davis RB, Eisenberg DM, Phillips RS. Perceived benefit of complementary and alternative mmedicine (CAM) for back pain: a national survey. J Am Board Family Med 2010;23:354–362.
Smith LA, Oldman AD, Mcquay HJ, Moore RA. Teasing apart quality and validity in systematic reviews: an example from acupuncture trials in chronic neck and back pain. Pain 2000;86:119–132.
Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain NICE clinical guideline No. 88. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009 May.
Harris P, Cooper K, Relton C, Thomas K. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. J Clin Pract 2012;66:924–939.
Macfarlane GJ, Paudyal P, Doherty M, Ernst E, Lewith G, Macpherson H et al. A systematic review of evidence for the effectiveness of practitioner-based complementary and alternative therapies in the management of rheumatic diseases: osteoarthritis. Rheumatology 2012;51:2224–2233.
Langhorst J, Haeuser W, Bernardy K, Lucius H, Settan M, Winkelmann A, et al. Complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia syndrome. Systematic review, meta-analysis and guideline. Schmerz 2012;26:311–317.
Choi TY, Choi J, Kim KH, Lee MS. Moxibustion for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Rheumat Int 2012;32:2969–2978.
Alraek T, Lee MS, Choi TY, Cao H, Liu J. Complementary and alternative medicine for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review. BMC Complement Altern Med 2011;11.
Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. Can Med Assoc J 2001;165:174–179.
Lyons RA, Perry HM, Littlepage BNC. Evidence for the validity of the Short-Form-36 Questionnaire (Sf-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing 1994;23:182–184.
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of Adult Pain Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:S240–S252.
Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind P. Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Bri J Rheumatol 1998;37:862–869.
Talamo J, Frater A, Gallivan S, Young A. Use of the short form 36 (SF36) for health status measurement in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1997;36:463–469.
Kosinski M, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, Kong SXD, Ware JE. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis—tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability. Med Care 1999;37:MS10–MS22.
Kiebzak GM, Campbell M, Mauerhan DR. The SF-36 general health status survey documents the burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint arthroplasty: But why should we use it? Am J Manag Care 2002;8:463–474.
Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum-Arthritis Care Res 2001;45:384–391.
Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The Sf-36 health survey questionnaire-an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS. Br Med J 1993;306:1440–1444.
Mendoza T, Mayne T, Rublee D, Cleeland C. Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain 2006;10:353–361.
Mathias SD, Crosby RD, Qian Y, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Chung K. Estimating minimally important differences for the worst pain rating of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. J Supp Oncol 2011;9:72–78.
Mendoza T, Mayne T, Rublee D, Cleeland C. Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain 2006;10:353–361.
Makarowski W, Zhao WW, Bevirt T, Recker DP. Efficacy and safety of the COX-2 specific inhibitor valdecoxib in the management of osteoarthritis of the hip: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with naproxen. Osteoarthr Cartil 2002;10:290–296.
Kivitz A, Eisen G, Zhao WW, Bevirt T, Recker DP: Randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of valdecoxib with naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis. J Family Pract 2002;51:530–537.
Jensen MP, Ehde DM, Hoffman AJ, Patterson DR, Czerniecki JM, et al. Cognitions, coping and social environment predict adjustment to phantom limb pain. Pain 2002;95:133–142.
Zelman DC, Gore M, Dukes E, Tai KS, Brandenburg N. Validation of a modified version of the Brief Pain Inventory for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Pain Symptom Manag 2005;29:401–410.
McDonald DD, Shea M, Fedo J, Rose L, Bacon K, Noble K, et al. Older Adult Pain Communication and the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form. Pain Manage Nurs 2008;9:154–159.
Chisholm D, Knapp MRJ, Knudsen HC, Amaddeo F, Gaite L, van Wijngaarden B. Client socio-demographic and service receipt inventory—European Version: development of an instrument for international research—EPSILON Study 5. Br J Psychiatry 2000;177:S28–S33.
Bowden A, Lorenc A, Robinson N. Autogenic training as a behavioural approach to insomnia: a prospective cohort study. Primary Health Care Res Developm 2012;13:175–185.
Barcellos Fontanella BJ, Luchesi BM, Borges Saidel MG, Ricas J, Turato ER, Melo DG. Sampling in qualitative research: a proposal for procedures to detect theoretical saturation. Cad Saude Publica 2011;27:389–394.
0
Views
0
Downloads
1
CSCD
- Meta-XMLDownload
- BibTeXDownload
- EndnoteDownload
- RefMan Download
- NoteExpressDownload
- NoteFirstDownload
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
- Address：1 Caochang, xiyuan, Beijing, People's Republic of China Postal code：100091
- Tel：010-62886827, 62877592 Fax：010-62874291
- Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备05067934号-1
京公网安备11010802024621 - It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
- Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.
