What can comparative effectiveness research, propensity score and registry study bring to Chinese medicine?

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

What can comparative effectiveness research, propensity score and registry study bring to Chinese medicine?

Updated：2021-08-27

|

- What can comparative effectiveness research, propensity score and registry study bring to Chinese medicine?
- Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Vol. 20, Issue 10, Pages: 792-795(2014)
- Affiliations：
  
  Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing,China
- Author bio：
- Funds：
  
  Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81202776), the Seventh-Science Foundation of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (No. ZZ070817) and the Sixth-Science Foundation of Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (No. Z0215)
- DOI：10.1007/s11655-013-1662-9
  CLC：
- Published：2014，
  
  Published Online：7 March 2014，
Scan for full text
Liao, X., Xie, Ym. What can comparative effectiveness research, propensity score and registry study bring to Chinese medicine?., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 20, 792–795 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1662-9

Xing Liao, Yan-ming Xie. What can comparative effectiveness research, propensity score and registry study bring to Chinese medicine?. [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 20(10):792-795(2014)
Liao, X., Xie, Ym. What can comparative effectiveness research, propensity score and registry study bring to Chinese medicine?., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 20, 792–795 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1662-9 DOI：

Xing Liao, Yan-ming Xie. What can comparative effectiveness research, propensity score and registry study bring to Chinese medicine?. [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 20(10):792-795(2014) DOI： 10.1007/s11655-013-1662-9.

摘要

The impact of evidence-based medicine and clinical epidemiology on clinical research has contributed to the development of Chinese medicine in modern times over the past two decades. Many concepts and methods of modern science and technology are emerging in Chinese medicine research

resulting in constant progress. Systematic reviews

randomized controlled trials and other advanced mathematic approaches and statistical analysis methods have brought reform to Chinese medicine. In this new era

Chinese medicine researchers have many opportunities and challenges. On the one hand

Chinese medicine researchers need to dedicate themselves to providing enough evidence to the world through rigorous studies

whilst on the other hand

they also need to keep up with the speed of modern medicine research. For example

recently

real world study

comparative effectiveness research

propensity score techniques and registry study have emerged. This article aims to inspire Chinese medicine researchers to explore new areas by introducing these new ideas and new techniques.

Abstract

The impact of evidence-based medicine and clinical epidemiology on clinical research has contributed to the development of Chinese medicine in modern times over the past two decades. Many concepts and methods of modern science and technology are emerging in Chinese medicine research

resulting in constant progress. Systematic reviews

randomized controlled trials and other advanced mathematic approaches and statistical analysis methods have brought reform to Chinese medicine. In this new era

Chinese medicine researchers have many opportunities and challenges. On the one hand

Chinese medicine researchers need to dedicate themselves to providing enough evidence to the world through rigorous studies

whilst on the other hand

they also need to keep up with the speed of modern medicine research. For example

recently

real world study

comparative effectiveness research

propensity score techniques and registry study have emerged. This article aims to inspire Chinese medicine researchers to explore new areas by introducing these new ideas and new techniques.

关键词

comparative effectiveness researchpropensity scoreregistry studyChinese Medicine

Keywords

comparative effectiveness researchpropensity scoreregistry studyChinese Medicine

references

Nestler G. Traditional Chinese medicine. Med Clin North Am 2002;86:63–73.

Tang JL, Zhan SY, Ernst E. Review of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine. BMJ 1999;319:160–161.

Zhan SY, Tang JL, Xie LY, Wu T, Bei D, Li LM. Review of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine from Chinese Medicine Academic journals and suggestions for future. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med (Chin) 1999;19:568–570.

Jiang M, Yang J, Zhang C, Liu B, Chan K, Cao HX, et al. Clinical studies with traditional Chinese medicine in the past decade and future research and development. Planta Med 2010;76:2048–2064.

Wang C, Cao B, Liu QQ, Zou ZQ, Liang ZA, Gu L, et al. Oseltamivir compared with the Chinese traditional therapy Maxingshigan-Yinqiaosan in the treatment of H1N1 influenza a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:217–225.

Zhang C, Jiang M, Lu AP. A traditional Chinese medicine versus Western combination therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-stage study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2011;12:1–8.

Wu DR, Cai YF, Cai JX, Liu QL, Zhao YQ, Cai JH, et al. Comparative effectiveness research on patients with acute ischemic stroke using Markov decision processes. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:1–10.

Tian F, Xie YM. Real-world study: a potential new approach to effectiveness evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine interventions. J Chin Integr Med 2010;8:301–306.

Xie YM, Liao X, Wang YY. Introduce the idea of comparative effectiveness research to clinical research of Chinese medicine. J Chin Integr Med 2011;9:813–818.

Möller HJ. Effectiveness studies: advantages and disadvantages. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2011;13:199–207.

“IOM: Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research ” http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2009/ComparativeEffectivenessResearchPriorities/CER%20report%20brief%. Retrieved 13 September 2008.pdf.

Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70:41–55.

Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011;46:399–424.

Georg H, Jüni P. An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1704–1708.

Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR. Propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:327–333.

Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70:41–45.

Ahmed A, Husain A, Love TE, Gambassi G, Dell’ Halia LJ, Francis GS, et al. Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methods. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1431–1439.

Rajeev H, Dehejia, Sadek W. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev Econ Stat 2002;84:151–161.

McCaffrey DF, Ridgeway G, Morral AR. Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychol Methods 2004;9:403–425.

Setoguchi S, Schneeweiss S, Brookhart MA, Glynn RJ, Cook EF. Evaluating uses of data mining techniques in propensity score estimation: a simulation study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2008;17:546–555.

Wang YJ, Cai HW, Xia JL, Jiang ZW. Scores on propensity (I) conception and measures. Chin J Epidemiol (Chin) 2010;31:347–348.

Wang YJ, Cai HW, Xia JL, Jiang ZW, Wang L. Propensity score (III) Key issues in practice of propensity score. Chin J Epidemiol (Chin) 2010;31:823–825.

Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. 2nd ed. (Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc. d/b/a Outcome] under Contract No.HHSA29020050035I TO3.) AHRQ Publication No.10-EHC049. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2010.

More>

0

Views

761

Downloads

0

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

Submit

Tools

Publicity Resources

Related Articles

Which research is needed to support clinical decision-making on integrative medicine?—Can comparative effectiveness research close the gap?

Future view and development of immunology: Exploring the immunology based on Chinese medicine and culture

Cost-effectiveness analysis of combined Chinese medicine and Western medicine for ischemic stroke patients

Objective tongue inspection on 142 liver cancer patients with damp-heat syndrome

Effect of Ermiao Recipe (二妙方) with medicinal guide Angelicae Pubescentis Radix on promoting the homing of bone marrow stem cells to treat cartilage damage in osteoarthritis rats

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Institute for Social Medicine

Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore

Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

The Institute for Integrative Health, Baltimore

Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen

Address：1 Caochang, xiyuan, Beijing, People's Republic of China Postal code：100091
Tel：010-62886827, 62877592 Fax：010-62874291
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备05067934号-1 京公网安备11010802024621
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰