FOLLOWUS
Ineffectiveness of Skin Tests in Predicting Allergic Reactions Induced by Chinese Herbal Injections
- Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Vol. 28, Issue 1, Pages: 36-42(2022)
- Affiliations：
1.Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin (300250), China
2.Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin (300250),China
3.Tianjin State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin (300250), China
4.State Key Laboratory of Drug Delivery Technology and Pharmacokinetics, Tianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, Tianjin (300250), China
- Author bio：
Prof. HUANG Yu-hong, E-mail: hyh101@126.com
- Funds：
DOI：10.1007/s11655-021-3523-2
CLC：Published：01 January 2022，
Published Online：24 November 2021，
Accepted：25 May 2021
Scan for full text
Chun-xiao LYU, Jun-hua ZHANG, Bao-he WANG, et al. Ineffectiveness of Skin Tests in Predicting Allergic Reactions Induced by Chinese Herbal Injections. [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 28(1):36-42(2022)
Chun-xiao LYU, Jun-hua ZHANG, Bao-he WANG, et al. Ineffectiveness of Skin Tests in Predicting Allergic Reactions Induced by Chinese Herbal Injections. [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 28(1):36-42(2022) DOI： 10.1007/s11655-021-3523-2.
摘要
目的:
2
评估皮肤试验是否适合预测中药注射剂引起的过敏反应.
方法:
2
针对银杏内酯注射液、银杏二萜内酯葡胺注射液和注射用丹参多酚酸三种中药注射剂
对249名健康受试者和180例过敏患者进行皮肤试验
包括皮肤点刺试验 (SPT) 、皮内试验 (IDT) 和激发试验 (包括皮下试验和静脉注射试验) . 激发试验结果被用作确定皮肤试验敏感性和特异性的 "金标准" .
结果:
2
在皮肤试验和激发试验中
健康受试者组和过敏受试者组比较
未见明显差异 (
P
>
0.05) . SPT和IDT的特异性分别为0.976和0.797
敏感性均为0.
结论:
2
皮肤试验可能不足以预测CHIs引起的过敏反应.
Abstract
Objective:
2
To evaluate whether skin tests are suitable to predict the allergy reactions induced by Chinese herbal injections (CHIs).
Methods:
2
The skin tests including skin prick tests (SPT)
intradermal tests (IDT) and provocation tests including subcutaneous tests and intravenous tests were administered to 249 healthy subjects and 180 allergic patients for 3 CHIs
including ginkgolide injection
diterpene ginkgolide meglumine injection and Salvianolate lyophilized injection. The results of the provocation tests were used as the "gold standard" to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the skin tests.
Results:
2
The results did not show any significant differences between the healthy and allergy groups in both skin tests and provocation tests (
P
>
0.05). The specificities of SPT and IDT were 0.976 and 0.797
respectively
and the sensitivities of both SPT and IDT were 0.
Conclusion:
2
Skin tests are insufficient to predict the likelihood of allergic reactions resulting from CHIs. (ChiCTR-CPC-15006921)
关键词
Keywords
adverse drug reactionsallergic reactionsChinese herbal injectionsskin tests
references
Fu MM, Meng XD, Li ZP. Analysis the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine in English literature development in modern history. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10:9241-9248.
Ren DQ. Promoting evidence-based development and use of traditional Chinese medicine injections. J Evid Based Med (Chin) 2010;3:2-3.
Ji KM, Chen JJ, Li M, Liu ZG, Xia LX, Wang CB. et al.Comments on serious anaphylaxis caused by nine Chinese herbal injections used to treat common colds and upper respiratory tract infections. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2009;55:134-138.
Wang L, Yuan Q, Marshall G, Cui XH, Cheng L, Li YY. et al.Adverse drug reactions and adverse events of 33 varieties of traditional Chinese medicine injections on National Essential medicines List (2004 edition) of China: an overview on published literatures. J Evid Based Med (Chin) 2010;3:95-104.
Tan LJ, Wang M, Zhu Y. Research progress of adverse reactions of traditional Chinese medicine injections. China J Chin Mater Med (Chin) 2014;39:3889-3898.
Lin YY，Yue Y. Investigation on incidence rate of adverse reaction in clinical application of traditional Chinese medicine injection. Chin J Biochem Pharm (Chin) 2016;4:179-181.
Xiao Y, Zhao Y, Xie YM. Design and implementation of fast allergy skin test detector for traditional Chinese medicine injections. Exp Ther Med 2017;13:1884-1890.
Li ZQ, Zhang Y, Liu J. Analysis of the research on adverse reaction of traditional Chinese medicine injections.Guangming J Chin Med (Chin) 2017;32:165-166.
National Medical Products Admininstration.https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/xxgk/fgwj/gzwj/gzwjyp/20071206120001186.htmlhttps://www.nmpa.gov.cn/xxgk/fgwj/gzwj/gzwjyp/20071206120001186.html.
Geng JL, Aa JY, Feng SQ, Wang SY, Wang P, Zhang Y,et al. Exploring the neuroprotective effects of Ginkgolides Injection in a rodent model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by GC-MS based metabolomic profiling. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2017;142:190-200.
Wu WY, Wang YP. Pharmacological actions and therapeutic applications of Salvia miltiorrhiza depside salt and its active components. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2012;33:1119-1130.
Sun J, Huang SH, Tan BKH, Whiteman M, Zhu C, Wu YJ,et al. Effects of purified herbal extract of Salvia miltiorrhiza on ischemic rat myocardium after acute myocardial infarction. Life Sci 2005;76:2849-2860.
Report on Cardiovascular Diseases in China 2018[EB/OL]. Available at: https://www.nccd.org.cn/Sites/Uploaded/File/2021/3/https://www.nccd.org.cn/Sites/Uploaded/File/2021/3/ Report on Cardiovascular Diseases in China 2018 (English).
Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M, Bilò MB, Brockow K,Fernández Rivas M, et al. Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.Allergy 2014;69:1026-1045.
Torres MJ, Sánchez-Sabaté E, Álvarez J, Mayorga C,Fernández J, Padial A, et al. Skin test evaluation in nonimmediate allergic reactions to penicillins. Allergy 2004;59:219-224.
Bavbek S, Yılmaz İ, Aydın Ö, Ozdemir SK. Pyrazinamide-induced anaphylaxis: diagnosed by skin test and successful desensitization. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2012;157:209-212.
Bansie RD, Karim AF, Maaren MSV, Hermans MAW, Daele PLAV, Wijk RGV, et al. Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: a review. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2021;35:1-13.
Seta V, Gaouar H, Badaoui A, Francès C, Barbaud A, Soria A. Low-dose provocation and skin tests in patients with hypersensitivity to gadolinium-based contrast agents. Clin Exp Allergy 2019;49:724-728.
Stingeni L, Bianchi L, Tramontana M, Pigatto PD, Patruno C, Corazza M. Skin tests in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2020;155:602-621.
Stephanie JF, Miguel AP. Penicillin skin testing is a safe and effective tool for evaluating penicillin allergy in the pediatric population. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2014;2:439-444.
Gadde J, Spence M, Wheeler B, Adkinson F. Clinical experience with penicillin skin testing in a large inner-city STD clinic. JAMA 1993;270:2456-2463.
Kumar SK, Arya S, Singh A, Misra R, Aggarwal A, Sinha S. Patterns of T and B cell responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis membrane-associated antigens and their relationship with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients with latent tuberculosis infection. PLoS One 2021;16:1-17.
Gastaminza G, Lafuente A, Goikoetxea MJ, D'Amelio CM,Amalia Bernad-Alonso A, Vega O, et al. Improvement of the elevated tryptase criterion to discriminate IgE–from non-IgE-mediated allergic reactions. Anesth Analg 2018;127:414-419.
Zeng ZP, Jiang JG. Analysis of the adverse reactions induced by natural product-derived drugs. B J Pharmacol 2010;159:1374-1391.
Development and Rational Use Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQs): retrieving Adverse Drug Reactions with MedDRA [EB/OL]. Available at: https://cioms.ch/sd7fdh93gewd882ds/78yudej8fddqd6s-red-book/CIOMS-MedDRA-RedBook-SECURED.pdfhttps://cioms.ch/sd7fdh93gewd882ds/78yudej8fddqd6s-red-book/CIOMS-MedDRA-RedBook-SECURED.pdf.
Li HN, Deng JX, Deng LW, Ren XQ, Xia JL. Safety profile of traditional Chinese herbal injection: an analysis of a spontaneous reporting system in China.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2019;28:1002-1013.
0
Views
0
Downloads
0
CSCD
- Meta-XMLDownload
- BibTeXDownload
- EndnoteDownload
- RefMan Download
- NoteExpressDownload
- NoteFirstDownload
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
- Address：1 Caochang, xiyuan, Beijing, People's Republic of China Postal code：100091
- Tel：010-62886827, 62877592 Fax：010-62874291
- Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备05067934号-1
京公网安备11010802024621 - It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
- Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.
