FOLLOWUS
1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington,Washington,USA
2. School of Statistics, Renmin University of China,Beijing,China
3. Biostatistics Unit, VA Seattle Medical Center,Seattle,USA
4. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing,China
纸质出版日期:2013,
网络出版日期:2013-7-2,
Scan for full text
Zhou, XH.A., Yang, W. Design and analysis of post-marketing research., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 19, 488–493 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1501-z
Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou, Wei Yang. Design and analysis of post-marketing research[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2013,19(7):488-493.
Zhou, XH.A., Yang, W. Design and analysis of post-marketing research., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 19, 488–493 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1501-z DOI:
Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou, Wei Yang. Design and analysis of post-marketing research[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2013,19(7):488-493. DOI: 10.1007/s11655-013-1501-z.
A post-marketing study is an integral part of research that helps to ensure a favorable risk-benefit profile for approved drugs used in the market. Because most of post-marketing studies use observational designs
which are liable to confounding
estimation of the causal effect of a drug versus a comparative one is very challenging. This article focuses on methodological issues of importance in designing and analyzing studies to evaluate the safety of marketed drugs
especially marketed traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) products. Advantages and limitations of the current designs and analytic methods for postmarketing studies are discussed
and recommendations are given for improving the validity of postmarketing studies in TCM products.
A post-marketing study is an integral part of research that helps to ensure a favorable risk-benefit profile for approved drugs used in the market. Because most of post-marketing studies use observational designs
which are liable to confounding
estimation of the causal effect of a drug versus a comparative one is very challenging. This article focuses on methodological issues of importance in designing and analyzing studies to evaluate the safety of marketed drugs
especially marketed traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) products. Advantages and limitations of the current designs and analytic methods for postmarketing studies are discussed
and recommendations are given for improving the validity of postmarketing studies in TCM products.
traditional Chinese medicine post-marketing researchsafety surveillancepharmacovigilance methodspropensity score
traditional Chinese medicine post-marketing researchsafety surveillancepharmacovigilance methodspropensity score
Baciu A, Stratton K, Burke SP. Committee on the Assessment of the US Drug Safety System. The future of drug safety: Promoting and protecting the health of the public. Washington DC: The National Academic Press; 2006:121–125.
Wang YY. Some thoughts on the development of traditional Chinese medicine industry in the essential drug system. China J Chin Mater Med (Chin) 2012:37:2677–2678.
Platt R, Carnahan RM, Brown JS, Chrischilles E, Curtis LH, Hennessy S, et al. The US food and drug administration’s mini-sentinel program: status and direction. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012:21(Suppl 1):1–8.
Stang P, Ryan P, Racoosin J, Overhage JM, Hartzema AG, Reich C, et al. Advancing the science for active surveillance: rationale and design for the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:600–606.
Raczkowski V. Interpretation of clinical safety data. FDA Presentation 2002 Dec 9.
Hauben M, Madigan D, Gerrits CM, Walsh L, Van Puijenbroek EP. The role of data mining in pharmacovigilance. Expert Opinion Drug Safety 2005;4:929–948.
Hauben M, Reich J. Communication of findings in pharmacovigilance: use of term “signal” and the need for precision in its use. European J Clin Pharm 2005;61,479.
Madigan D, Ryan P, Simpson S, Zorych I. Bayesian methods in pharmacovigilance. BAYESIAN STATISTICS 9. Oxford University Press; 2010:421–438.
Psaty B, Furberg CD, Ray WA, Weiss NS. Potential for conflict of interest in the evaluation of suspected adverse drug reactions. Use of cerivastatin and risk of rhabdomyolysis. JAMA 2004:21:2622–2631.
Xiang YY, Xie YM, Yi DH. Case study of Chinese medicine after listing of pharmacovigilance. China J Chin Materia Med (Chin) 2011;36:2836–2839.
Schneeweiss S, Rassen JA, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Mogun H, Brookhart MA. High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data. Epidemiology 2009;20:512–522.
Toh S, García Rodríguez LA, Hernán MA. Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011;20:849–857.
0
浏览量
965
Downloads
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构