Development, reliability and validity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50)
Back to article page
OriginalPaper|Updated:2021-08-27
|
Development, reliability and validity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50)
Development, reliability and validity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50)
中国结合医学杂志(英文版)2017年23卷第5期 页码:350-356
Affiliations:
1. Center for Studies in Constitution and Reproductive Sciences of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Basic Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing,China
Zhang, Hm., Bai, Mh. & Wang, Q. Development, reliability and validity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50)., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 23, 350–356 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-014-1853-z
Hui-min Zhang, Ming-hua Bai, Qi Wang. Development, reliability and validity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50)[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2017,23(5):350-356.
Zhang, Hm., Bai, Mh. & Wang, Q. Development, reliability and validity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50)., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 23, 350–356 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-014-1853-zDOI:
Hui-min Zhang, Ming-hua Bai, Qi Wang. Development, reliability and validity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50)[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2017,23(5):350-356. DOI: 10.1007/s11655-014-1853-z.
Development, reliability and validity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50)
摘要
To develop a health-evaluating scale from a Chinese medicine (CM) perspective and reflecting CM conception of health. The Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50) was developed by verification of dimensions
formation of item pool
verification of scoring methodology
and pilot test of scale and item analysis. TCM-50 composed of 50 items that could be classified into 4 dimensions including physiology and health
psychology and health
nature and health
and society and health. An examination of reliability and validity of TCM-50 yielded Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.927
and half coefficient of was 0.876. The intraclass correlation coefficient of total score was 0.912. After using SF-36 questionnaire to evaluate the criterion validity
the Pearson of the score of the two scales from the same participant was 0.740. TCM-50 has good reliability and validity
and can yield similar levels of efficacy as SF-36 in terms of evaluating people’s overall health level. As a scale based on CM theory
TCM-50 is suitable for self-measuring the general health of Chinese patients.
Abstract
To develop a health-evaluating scale from a Chinese medicine (CM) perspective and reflecting CM conception of health. The Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50) was developed by verification of dimensions
formation of item pool
verification of scoring methodology
and pilot test of scale and item analysis. TCM-50 composed of 50 items that could be classified into 4 dimensions including physiology and health
psychology and health
nature and health
and society and health. An examination of reliability and validity of TCM-50 yielded Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.927
and half coefficient of was 0.876. The intraclass correlation coefficient of total score was 0.912. After using SF-36 questionnaire to evaluate the criterion validity
the Pearson of the score of the two scales from the same participant was 0.740. TCM-50 has good reliability and validity
and can yield similar levels of efficacy as SF-36 in terms of evaluating people’s overall health level. As a scale based on CM theory
TCM-50 is suitable for self-measuring the general health of Chinese patients.
关键词
Chinese Medicinehealth statusscaleTCM-50reliabilityvalidity
Keywords
Chinese Medicinehealth statusscaleTCM-50reliabilityvalidity
references
Shang QX. Discussion on the health status and regulation from the aspect of TCM. Shandong J Tradit Chin Med (Chin) 2006;25:363–365.
Lin J, Yang JF, Liu Q. Study summary of health status recognition theory. J Guangxi Tradit Chin Med Univ (Chin) 2010;13:74–78.
Jiang LD. Discussion on concepts of the health, subhealth, before sickness and prevention. Chin J Tradit Chin Med (Chin) 2010;25:167–170.
World Health Organization. The constitution of the World Health Organization. WHO Chronicle 1948;1:13.
Meng QQ, Zhang TH. Study process of health self-evaluation indexes. Chin Prev Med (Chin) 2010;11:750–752.
Gamsiz Bilgin N, Mert E, Sezgin M. Evaluation of the effects of disabilities due to traffic accidents on the quality of life using SF-36 health survey. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012;46:168–173.
Thumboo J, Strand V. Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an update. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36:115–122.
Grandy S, Fox KM. Change in health status (EQ-5D) over 5 years among individuals with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus in the SHIELD longitudinal study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012;10:99.
Ginieri-Coccossis M, Triantafillou E, Tomaras V, Liappas IA, Christodoulou GN, Papadimitriou GN. Quality of life in mentally ill, physically ill and healthy individuals: the validation of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-100) questionnaire. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2009;8:23.
Chung WS, Lan YL, Yang MC. Psychometric testing of the short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Taiwan. BMC Public Health 2012;12:630.
Zhu YB, ed. Measure and evaluation of quality of life. Beijing: People’s Military Medical Press; 2010:6.
Liu FB, Lang JY, Zhao L, Fang JQ, Liang GH, Lin LZ. Study of establishment of TCM health status scale. J Sun Yatsen Univ (Chin) 2008;29:332–336.
Wu DR, Lai SL, Guo XF, Wen ZH, Liang WX. Establishment of TCM health scale and preliminary evaluation. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med (Chin) 2007;27:847–850.
Zhong JB. Design of health status questionnaire based on TCM five-zang system. J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med (Chin) 2010;12(8):86–88.
Guo R, Tang L, Zhong JB. Current situation of study of TCM health status and quality of life scale. J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med (Chin) 2012;14:217–220.
Wiklund I. Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2004;18:351–363.
Sun GR, ed. Basic theory of TCM. Beijing: China Publishing House of TCM; 2006:256.
Liu JP, ed. Clinical research methodology of evidence based medicine on TCM. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2006:89.
Xie YN, ed. Statistics in psychology. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2007:147.
Booth ML, Owen N. Retest reliability of recall measures of leisure-time physical activity in Australian adults. Int J Epidemiol 1996;25:153.
Steiner DL, Norman, eds. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995:124–138.
Vander Steeg AF, De Vries J, Roukema JA. Quality of life and health status in breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:1051–1057.