Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain

Zhen-yu Liu; Bao-ge Liu; Xin Lin

doi:10.1007/s11655-014-2010-4

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain

OriginalPaper | Updated：2021-08-27

- Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain
- Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain
- 中国结合医学杂志（英文版） 2014年20卷第12期页码：917-922
- Affiliations：
  
  Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing,China
- Author bio：
- Funds：
- DOI：10.1007/s11655-014-2010-4
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2014，
  
  网络出版日期：2014-8-21，
Scan for full text
Liu, Zy., Liu, Bg. & Lin, X. Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 20, 917–922 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-014-2010-4

Zhen-yu Liu, Bao-ge Liu, Xin Lin. Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2014,20(12):917-922.
Liu, Zy., Liu, Bg. & Lin, X. Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 20, 917–922 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-014-2010-4 DOI：

Zhen-yu Liu, Bao-ge Liu, Xin Lin. Kinematic effect of Chinese herbal fomentation on patients with chronic neck pain[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2014,20(12):917-922. DOI： 10.1007/s11655-014-2010-4.

摘要

To clarify the effectiveness of Chinese herbal fomentation in treating chronic neck pain by means of changes in cervical kinematics. Seventy-six patients with chronic neck pain were included in the study and were randomized into two groups based on the random number generator of the SPSS software: fomentation combined with Chinese herbal (Group 1) and fomentation without any medicine (Group 2). In both groups

the fomentation lasted for 60 min and heated to 35 °C

once a day for 28 consecutive days. Standard lateral radiographs of the cervical spine were obtained including the neutral

full flexion

and full extension positions. Before and after intervention

the following parameters were used to evaluate the changes in kinematics: range of motion (ROM)

sagittal alignment and instantaneous center of rotation (ICR). After treatment

the ROM was signifcantly higher than that of before treatment in Group 1 (51.5

95% CI: 49.8–55.9; P<0.05). There was no significant difference between before and after treatment in Group 2 (P>0.05). Although C2-C7 cervical alignment was increased in both groups after treatment

no significant difference was detected between before and after treatment (P>0.05). For Group 1

the significant X coordinate variation was only observed at C5/C6 level (38.1; 95% CI: 34.0

42.1; P<0.05). There was a significant upward trend in the Y coordinate of the ICR at C5/C6 (−30.5; 95% CI: −34.3

−26.8; P<0.05) and C6/C7 after treatment (−6.1; 95% CI: −6.7

−5.4; P<0.05). For Group 2

the ICR location of each level was not statistically different between the pre- and post-treatment (P>0.05). Chinese herbal fomentation could improve abnormal mobility in terms of ROM and ICR. Chinese herbal fomentation might be an effective treatment for chronic neck pain.

Abstract

the fomentation lasted for 60 min and heated to 35 °C

once a day for 28 consecutive days. Standard lateral radiographs of the cervical spine were obtained including the neutral

full flexion

and full extension positions. Before and after intervention

the following parameters were used to evaluate the changes in kinematics: range of motion (ROM)

sagittal alignment and instantaneous center of rotation (ICR). After treatment

the ROM was signifcantly higher than that of before treatment in Group 1 (51.5

no significant difference was detected between before and after treatment (P>0.05). For Group 1

the significant X coordinate variation was only observed at C5/C6 level (38.1; 95% CI: 34.0

42.1; P<0.05). There was a significant upward trend in the Y coordinate of the ICR at C5/C6 (−30.5; 95% CI: −34.3

−26.8; P<0.05) and C6/C7 after treatment (−6.1; 95% CI: −6.7

−5.4; P<0.05). For Group 2

关键词

Chinese herbal fomentationbiomechanicsneck pain

Keywords

Chinese herbal fomentationbiomechanicsneck pain

references

Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Kristman V. The annual incidence and course of neck pain in the general population: a population-based cohort study. Pain 2004;112:267–273.

Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2005;15:834–848.

Amevo B, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Abnormal instantaneous axes of rotation in patients with neck pain. Spine 1992;17:748–756.

Vogt L, Segieth C, Banzer W, Himmelreich H. Movement behaviour in patients with chronic neck pain. Physiother Res Int 2007;12:206–212.

Fu WB, Liang ZH, Zhu XP, Yu P, Zhang JF. Analysis on the effect of acupuncture in treating cervical spondylosis with different syndrome types. Chin J Integr Med 2009;15:426–430.

Moon TW, Choi TY, Park TY, Lee MS. Chuna therapy for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials in Korean literature. Chin J Integr Med 2013;19:228–232.

Zhang SW, Mi ZX, Li SH, Zhang DH, Deng Q. Evaluate the clinical outcome of modified open door laminoplasty using anchor method combined with Chinese herbs pyrogenic dressing therapy. Cina J Orthopaed Traumatol (Chin) 2008;21:934–935.

Cui J, Liu X, Wei HE, Zhang XQ, Li XH. The impact of electroacupuncture with traditional Chinese medicine fomentation to hypertrophic cervical spondylosis in clinic and electromyogram. J Jiangxi Univ Tradit Chin Med (Chin) 2008;20(4):58–60.

Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ, Holland B. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine 2000;25:2072–2078.

Bogduk N, Mercer S. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 2000;15:633–648.

White A, Panjabi M, eds. Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1990:88–89.

Amevo B, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Instantaneous axes of rotation of the typical cervical motion segments: I. An empirical study of technical errors. Clin Biomechanics 1991;6:31–37.

Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A, Mazel C, Guise JD, Skalli W. Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J 2006;6:982–991.

Woodhouse A, Vasseljen O. Altered motor control patterns in whiplash and chronic neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:90.

Hagen KB, Harms-Ringdahl K, Enger NO, Hedenstad R, Morten H. Relationship between subjective neck disorders and cervical spine mobility and motion related pain in male machine operators. Spine 1997;22:1501–1507.

de Loose V, van den Oord M, Burnotte F, van Tiggelen D, Stevens V, Cagnie B, et al. Functional assessment of the cervical spine in F-16 pilots with and without neck pain. Aviation Space Environm Med 2009;80:477–481.

Schneider G, Pearcy MJ, Bogduk N. Abnormal motion in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 2005;30:1159–1164.

Grip H, Sundelin G, Gerdle B, Stefan Karlsson J. Cervical helical axis characteristics and its center of rotation during active head and upper arm movements-comparisons of whiplash-associated disorders, non-specific neck pain and asymptomatic individuals. J Biomech 2008;41:2799–2805.

Bogduk N, Marsland A. The cervical zygapophysial joints as a source of neck pain. Spine 1988;13:610–617.

Falla D. Unravelling the complexity of muscle impairment in chronic neck pain. Man Ther 2004;9:125–133.

Falla D, Jull G, Hodges PW. Feedforward activity of the cervical flexor muscles during voluntary arm movements is delayed in chronic neck pain. Exp Brain Res 2004;157:43–48.

Ylinen J, Takala EP, Kautiainen H, Nykänen M, Häkkinen A, Pohjolainen T, et al. Association of neck pain, disability and neck pain during maximal effort with neck muscle strength and range of movement in women with chronic non-specific neck pain. Eur J Pain 2004;8:473–478.

Wolff MW, Levine LA. Cervical radiculopathies: conservative approaches to management. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2002;13:589–608.

Wolsko PM, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Kessler R, Phillips, RS. Patterns and perceptions of care for treatment of back and neck pain: results of a national survey. Spine 2003;28:292–297.

FULL TEXT LINK

More>

浏览量

613

Downloads

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

工具集

关联资源

Research progress on the standardization of Chinese Tuina therapy: A short review

A study on extension-flexion dynamic lumbar spine radiographs in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation

Is manipulative therapy clinically necessary for relief of neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study on Force Mechanism for Therapeutic Effect of Pushing Manipulation with One-Finger Meditation Base on Similarity Analysis of Force and Waveform