
FOLLOWUS
1. PLA Research Center of Traditional Chinese Manipulative Orthopedics, General Air Force Hospital,Beijing
2. Department of Radiology, General Air Force Hospital,China
3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University,China
纸质出版日期:2005,
Scan for full text
Ping, Z., Li-jun, C., Jing, G. et al. Charge couple device-based system for 3-dimensional real time positioning on the assessment of segmental range of motion of lumbar spine., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 11, 272–278 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02835788
Zhao Ping, Chen Li-jun, Guan Jing, et al. Charge couple device-based system for 3-dimensional real time positioning on the assessment of segmental range of motion of lumbar spine[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2005,11(4):272-278.
Ping, Z., Li-jun, C., Jing, G. et al. Charge couple device-based system for 3-dimensional real time positioning on the assessment of segmental range of motion of lumbar spine., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 11, 272–278 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02835788 DOI:
Zhao Ping, Chen Li-jun, Guan Jing, et al. Charge couple device-based system for 3-dimensional real time positioning on the assessment of segmental range of motion of lumbar spine[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2005,11(4):272-278. DOI: 10.1007/BF02835788.
Objective: To observe the tested results of the segmental range of motion (ROM) of lumbar spine by charge couple device (CCD)-based system for 3-dimensional real-time positioning (CCD system)
and to analyze its clinical significance.Methods: Seven patients with lumbar joint dysfunction and 8 healthy subjects were tested twice by the CCD-based system with an interval of 10 min.Results: The ROM of the patients was obviously lesser than that of the healthy subjects. The measuring data of segmental ROM of lumbar spine by CCD system is correlated significantly to the same data checked later on the same subjects in every direction of the movements. The differences between two checks are usually less than 1 degree.Conclusion: Specially designed CCD based system for 3-dimensional real-time positioning could objectively reflect the segmental ROM of lumbar spine. The system would be of great clinical significance in the assessment of the biomechanical dysfunction of lumbar spine and the effect of the treatment applied.
Objective: To observe the tested results of the segmental range of motion (ROM) of lumbar spine by charge couple device (CCD)-based system for 3-dimensional real-time positioning (CCD system)
and to analyze its clinical significance.Methods: Seven patients with lumbar joint dysfunction and 8 healthy subjects were tested twice by the CCD-based system with an interval of 10 min.Results: The ROM of the patients was obviously lesser than that of the healthy subjects. The measuring data of segmental ROM of lumbar spine by CCD system is correlated significantly to the same data checked later on the same subjects in every direction of the movements. The differences between two checks are usually less than 1 degree.Conclusion: Specially designed CCD based system for 3-dimensional real-time positioning could objectively reflect the segmental ROM of lumbar spine. The system would be of great clinical significance in the assessment of the biomechanical dysfunction of lumbar spine and the effect of the treatment applied.
charge couple device cameralumbar spineradiologysegmental range of motion
charge couple device cameralumbar spineradiologysegmental range of motion
Garfin SR. Compressive neuropathy of spinal nerve roots. A mechanical or biological problem? Spine 1991;16(2): 162–168.
Zhao P, Feng TY. The biomechanical significance of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc: A clinical compara-tive analysis of 22 patients with multiple and 39 patients with single lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. J Ma-nipulative Physiol Ther 1996; 19(6): 391–395.
Saal JA, Saal JS, Herzog RG. The natural history of lumbar intervertebral disc extrusions treated nonopera-tively. Spine 1990; 15(7): 683–688
Wiesel SW. A study of computer assisted tomography.the incidence of positive CAT scans in asymptomatic group of patients. Spine, 1984;9(6): 549–551.
Maitland GD. Spine manipulation. 5th ed. London: Butterworth, 1986: 60–70
Gregory PG. Mobilisation of the spine. 5th ed. Edin-burgh London: Churchill Livingstone, 1997: 62–80.
Paris SV. Mobilization of the spine. Phys Ther 1979;59(8): 988–995.
Hazard RG. Spine update. Functional restoration. Spine 1995;20(21): 2345–2348.
Lee M, Kelly DW, Steven GP. A model of spine, rib-cage and pelvic responses to a specific lumbar manipula-tive force in relaxed subjects. J Biomech 1995; 28(11): 1403–1408.
Twomey L, Taylor L. Exercise and spinal manipulation in the treatment of low back pain. Spine 1995; 20(5): 615–619.
Cassidy JD, Lopes AA, Yong Hing K. The immediate effect of manipulation vs. mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1993; 16(4): 279 -280.
Shekelle PG, Adams AH, Chassin MR, et al. Spinal manipulation for low-back pain. Ann Intern Med 1992;117(7): 590–598.
Nathan M. Keller TS. Measurement and analysis of thein vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther1994; 17(7): 431–441.
Haas M. Nyiendo J. Lumbar motion trends and correla-tion with low back pain. Part II. A roentgenological e-valuation of quantitative segmental motion in lateral ben-ding. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992; 15(4): 224 -234.
Kopp J R. The use of lumbar extension in the evaluation and treatment of patients with acute herniated nucleus pulposus. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop 1986; 202(5): 211–213.
Hunsmeier D, Wood J. Evaluation of a computerized electrogoniometer. J Chiropr Res Clin Invest 1994;9(3): 6–10.
Henrik WC. Precision an accuracy of an electogoniome-ter. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999; 22(1): 10–14.
Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Chang DG, et al. Functional ra-diographic diagnosis of the lumbar spine. Flexion-exten-sion and lateral bending. Spine 1991; 16(5): 562–571.
Putto E, Tallroth K. Extension-flexion radiographs for motion studies of the lumbar spine. A comparison of two methods. Spine 1990; 15(2): 107–110.
Zhao P, Feng TY. Clinical significance of dynamic radio-graph in the patients with lumbar intervertebral disk her-niation. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med 1995; 1(3): 197–120.
Kelemen J, Eichhorn M, Ovenhausen K, et al. Reliabil-ity and validity studies with the triflexometer, a new method for assessing form and flexibility of the spine. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 1998; 37(2): 78–84.
Mayer TG, Kondraske G, Beals SB. Spinal range of mo-tion. Accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement. Spine 1997; 22(17): 1976–1984.
Axelsson P, Johnsson R, Stromqvist B, et al. The spondylolytic vertebra and its adjacent segment. Mobility measured before and after posterolateral fusion. Spine 1997; 22(4): 414–417.
Rainville J, Sobel JB, Hartigan C. Comparison of total lumbosacral flexion and true lumbar flexion measured by a dual inclinometer technique. Spine 1994; 19(23): 2698–2701.
Rondinelli R, Murphy J, Esler A, et al. Estimation of normal lumbar flexion with surface inclinometry. A com-parison of three methods. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 71(4): 219–224.
Merritt JL, McLean TJ, Erickson RP. Measurement of trunk flexibility in normal subjects: reproducibility of three clinical methods. Mayo Clin Proc 1986; 61(3): 192–197.
Reynolds PM. Measurement of spinal mobility: a com-parison of three methods. Rheumatol Rehabil 1975; 14 (3): 180–185.
Boden SD, Dais DO, Dina TS, et al. Abnormal magnetic resonace scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic sub-jects. A Prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72(3): 403–408.
Penning L. Instability in lumbar spondylolisthesis: A ra-diological study of several concepts. Am J Radiol 1980; 134(5): 293–298
Pan Li, Zhang Q, Xiao XS, et al. CCD-based system for three-dimensional real-time positioning. Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference of the IEEE en-gineering in medicine and biology society. Hong Kong, 1998; 20(5): 2503–2506.
Guo SF. Clinical anatomy of orthopedics. Tianjin: Tian-jin Publishing House of Science 1987: 210.
Korpi J, Poussa M, Heliovaara M. Radiographic mobili-ty of the lumbar spine and its relation to clinical back motion. Scand J Rehabil Med 1988;20(2): 71–76.
McGregor AH, McCarthy D, Hughes SP. Motion char-acteristics of the lumbar spine in the nomal population. Spine 1995; 20(6): 2421–2428.
0
浏览量
405
Downloads
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621