Wiseman, N. Concerning the use of Western medical terms to represent traditional Chinese medical concepts —Answer to Prof. Xie and his colleagues., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 12, 225–228 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02836530
Nigel Wiseman. Concerning the use of Western medical terms to represent traditional Chinese medical concepts —Answer to Prof. Xie and his colleagues[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2006,12(3):225-228.
Wiseman, N. Concerning the use of Western medical terms to represent traditional Chinese medical concepts —Answer to Prof. Xie and his colleagues., Chin. J. Integr. Med. 12, 225–228 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02836530DOI:
Nigel Wiseman. Concerning the use of Western medical terms to represent traditional Chinese medical concepts —Answer to Prof. Xie and his colleagues[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2006,12(3):225-228. DOI: 10.1007/BF02836530.
Concerning the use of Western medical terms to represent traditional Chinese medical concepts —Answer to Prof. Xie and his colleagues
摘要
This paper strongly rejects the notion that the use of biomedical terms to represent traditional Chinese medical concepts is helpful to the internationalization of Chinese medicine. It further argues that this practice destroys the integrity and independence of Chinese medical concepts. Taking the term fēng hu< o y < an as an example
it shows that the biomedical term “acute conjunctivitis” often suggested as the translation for this term is unsatisfactory
because (1) the clinical reference is not identical
(2) it introduces the concepts of “conjunctiva” and “inflammation”
which are not Chinese medical concepts
and (3) destroys the Chinese medical concepts “wind” and “fire” expressed in the Chinese
which reflect the way the disease is traditionally diagnosed and treated. While for English readers not familiar with Chinese medicine
“acute conjunctivitis” may be immediately intelligible
for those seeking a deep understanding of the subject
the literal translation (loan translation) “wind-fire eye” is much more helpful. This paper supports these arguments with numerous other examples.
Abstract
This paper strongly rejects the notion that the use of biomedical terms to represent traditional Chinese medical concepts is helpful to the internationalization of Chinese medicine. It further argues that this practice destroys the integrity and independence of Chinese medical concepts. Taking the term fēng hu< o y < an as an example
it shows that the biomedical term “acute conjunctivitis” often suggested as the translation for this term is unsatisfactory
because (1) the clinical reference is not identical
(2) it introduces the concepts of “conjunctiva” and “inflammation”
which are not Chinese medical concepts
and (3) destroys the Chinese medical concepts “wind” and “fire” expressed in the Chinese
which reflect the way the disease is traditionally diagnosed and treated. While for English readers not familiar with Chinese medicine
“acute conjunctivitis” may be immediately intelligible
for those seeking a deep understanding of the subject
the literal translation (loan translation) “wind-fire eye” is much more helpful. This paper supports these arguments with numerous other examples.
Xie ZF, White P. Comments on Nigel Wiseman’sA Practical Dictionary of Chinese Medicine (I)—On the “Word-for-word” Literal Approach to Translation. Chin J Integr Med 2005;12(4): 305–308.
Xlie ZF, White P. Comments on Nigel Wiseman’ sA Practical Dictionary of Chinese Medicine (II)—On the use Western Medicine Terms to Express the Concepts of Tratiditionla Chinese Medicine. Chin J Integr Med 2006;13 (1): 61–65.
Xie ZF. English translation of common terms in traditional Chinese medicine. Beijing: China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2004.
Cooper RA. Health care workforce for the twenty-first century: The impact of nonphysician clinicians. Annual Review Med 2001;52: 51–61.